Rubrics, assessment
MAT 2015-16
Aaron Schmidt Andrew Fischer Brad Tombers Brian Gehring Brianna Bierma Caroline Bradshaw Colleen Caroll Dylan Peterson Elizabeth Carmichael Ezra Gibson Heidi Brook Hunter Scholtz Jake Newton Jasper Nelson John Brunn Jordan Kendall Joseph Mainardi Karli Dreer Katelyn Heller Keane Richards Kristin Vantrease Lindsay Clark Luke Gunkel Makenzie Moore Maureen D'Armand Michelle Snyder Mike Hoyt Mostapha Beya Ruth Hogle Ryan Flanagan Scott Grant Sophia Butler Stephen Fink Svetlana Filkova Terri Draeger Tom Honer Assignments- on-going 1. ePortfolio development 2. Online community 3. Professional library Assignments, scheduled 1. School edtech culture eval 2. New media narrative 3. Individual learning project Resources, info 1. Evaluation, grading 2. Syllabus, timeline 3. Rubrics and assessments 4. ISTE NET T Standards Model ePortfolios Alysyn Thibault (Wikispaces) (2011-12) Callie Wilder (Weebly) (2013-14) Emily Buck (Google Sites) (2011-12) Rebecca Hartwell (Google Sites) (2011-12) Spencer Beckman (Weebly) (2014-15) Model digital stories Gabe Bailey The Matanuska Colony Mara Early Elizabeth Peratrovich Abe Olsen Aleutian Relocation Chris Frank The Vital Marine Highway System Rebecca Hartwell Salmon Troller Emily Buck Confessions of a Runner Layne Sarvela Double Replacement Reaction Crystal Ahlstrom The Moose Hunt |
Why assessment?
The goal in using rubrics and assessments is to help you improve. That's why I don't grade your work and return it to you. Instead, I annotate it, we talk about it, and then you improve it. Therefore, you can expect to revise your work at least once. Doing so is fairly standard in this class. Three elements of assessment There are three elements of assessment:
1. Did you meet the objective of the assignment? This is fairly straightforward. The assignments and outcomes are clearly described. 2. Did you create a professional ePortfolio posting? Elements of a clear and professional ePortfolio appear below. This was adapted from "E-Portfolio Evaluation Criteria," proposed by Penn State (Penn State, 2006 http://psu.edu). I. Operational (e-Portfolio functions well). Indicators:
II. Appearance (e-Portfolio looks well). Indicators:
Evidence. Indicators:
Reflection. Indicators:
3. Was your writing clear, well-organized and professional? I am a stickler for clear, crisp English. You should be too. Remember: This is your ePortfolio that the world may read. If potential employers see unprofessional writing, they will disengage. Generally, I look at your writing holistically. But here are four traits to pay attention to:
|